He said the likes of Amazon were on average bringing in $1,000 to $10,000 a year from most smaller customers through "commodity" piecemeal cloud services. The real money, he said, was to be made in mission critical and specialised cloud services from larger firms.
But if major firms are to fully adopt cloud working they will want to see the cloud industry get together and thrash out service delivery standards, said the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF), an industry forum promoting established Ethernet technologies in the public cloud.
Kevin Vachon, chief operating officer of the MEF, said: "When it comes to APIs, standards, business models, service delivery and established cloud architectures, the cloud industry is in a bit of a mess."
Vachon said the MEF was now working with cloud carriers to improve matters through an initiative set up by the US National Institute of Science and Technology, which seeks to bring together cloud consumers, providers, auditors, brokers and carriers to deliver standards the whole industry can work to.
Vachon said the MEF expected to issue guidance to cloud carriers in relation to the NIST initiative this December or January 2012.
Some delegates at the Netevents symposium thought a real stumbling block was the complicated way that some consumers viewed the cloud though.
Steve Garrison, vice president of marketing at networking firm Infoblox, said: "The term 'cloud' itself is pretty meaningless, the cloud is really just a big mainframe platform you use to get your data from and some of the server companies are over-complicating the issue."
On security, there is often much debate to be had as to whether firms should go down the 'private' or 'public' cloud route, but Sean Larner, vice president of wireless networking provider Xirrus, said: "The private and public clouds are converging and you can't cancel out the security risks whichever cloud road you go down."


